October 7, 2013
When I first published this post back in August, I honestly thought that neither a government shutdown nor a Debt Ceiling default was within the realm of possibility in a world of rational people. After all, I thought, in the end cooler heads would prevail.
I’ll never make that mistake again!
Now with the House of Representatives being held as political prisoners, because the GOP’s super-conservative faction (is cult too strong a term–maybe not! Look up the definition of a cult) has decided that the idea of majority rule as enshrined in the U.S. Constitution no longer applies to them, and therefore, they can stage an ideological and, therefore, legislative coup, violating both the Constitution and their pledge to defend it. Of course, in their twisted logic, they believe they are defending the Constitution from the rest of us who are…well, just the rest of us. The notion of majority rule can just go to hell. They threaten to take the nation over the socioeconomic edge into a pit of unknown calamities, though, the economy crashing down around our heads is likely to be one major consequence.
After the election in fall 2012, I was thinking, ‘Okay, now we can get back to Congress doing some real business. The next election is a long way off and I’m burned out with the 24-hour election cycle we were subjected to by the media, and anybody else with an axe to grind and a Twitter account.’ Now, I can’t wait for Fall 2014 to get here soon enough, presuming we have some semblance of an electoral process still intact, so through some miracle, this group of constitutional insurgents can get voted out of office. Way out. Maybe to be the new boots on the ground in Afghanistan as we pull our troops out. I’m sure they and the Taliban would have most interesting debates over ideological sledge hammering. The Taliban are against compromise, too. Oops, did I just compare the tea party insurgents to the insurgents in Afghanistan? Well, of course not. I obviously just used the illustration to highlight the fact the tea party politicians are pathologically opposed to compromise.
Oh, and by the way, for those of you who have been Extreme Thinkover readers since the beginning, The Sniffer and I are very pleased with the Affordable Care Act rollout. Minute by minute, Americans’ demand for access to health insurance is building as a wave against those who would still deny them that. And as the Exchanges get the opening kinks worked out, the Whiff’ and I both have this strong feeling the initial registration and enrollment period will exceed the everybody’s predictions, perhaps by the many millions.
And all the Republicans have to present to the nation as their alternative national health care plan remains that one blank piece of paper that Boehner, Cantor, and McConnell were so smug about in January 2010 when they met with the President. Oh yeah, and then a month and a half later President Obama signed the bill into law on March 23, 2010. Majority rules.
Now we are closer to devolving into a parliamentary morasse than when I posted this essay:
The Birth of the the United States Parliament
Sometimes you get an insight by reading what is going on someplace else in the world. I’ll admit that’s not a ground-shaking revelation, but the insight can be a point of sudden snap-focus into what is happening right here under your nose.
In my case, this “ah-hah!” moment came from reading a New York Times Op-Ed article by Shmuel Rosner, a Tel Aviv journalist and senior political editor for The Jewish Journal. His piece, titled, “The Tyranny of the Minority” (2 August 2013) discusses changes that are taking place in the Knesset, Israel’s Parliament, regarding adjustments to the election laws that determine the threshold percentage needed to win a seat in body. The specifics are not important to my point (you can read the article if you are interested), but the impact of the changes on how the minority parties will have to negotiate to have a voice caught my attention.
I contend we have in the United States House of Representatives not just the birth, but the rapid evolutionary growth of a parliamentary structure; a structure that, according to my reading of the United States Constitution, should never exist.
For some context, here’s what’s happening in the Knesset. As the percentage threshold for winning a seat in the assembly is raised, the smaller parties that might have had just one or two seats under the old rule are now unable to win even a single seat. Since these small parties represent minorities to begin with, such as different Arab groups, and more extreme Jewish conservative and liberal parties, they are faced with a huge dilemma. How does a single party negotiate with one (or more) of the others to piece together a coalition that might mean compromising with a group they find politically distasteful? And even worse, from their perspective, what if their only solution was to compromise and attach themselves to one of the mainline “Jewish” parties?
Raising the threshold was proposed on the theory that it could help stabilize Israel’s political scene by strengthening the two leading parties. It may not: Some say it would only create more midsize parties. But at least it would fix the currents system’s main pitfall, which is to discourage compromise among all parties by encouraging the proliferation of small ones.
Huh? An image began to form in my mind sketching out what is happening in the House of Representatives as we observe the growing influence of smaller and smaller groups of politically narrowly-aligned representatives declaring that they are fighting perceived tyranny in the size and function of the Federal Government, but ironically, growing closer to manifesting and exercising a true “tyranny of the minority” over the House.
Rosner’s closing point was my snap-focus realization:
For a country as varied and complicated as Israel, the representation of minorities is crucial. But for a country as varied and complicated as Israel, learning to compromise is even more important.
Bang! Substitute the words “United States” for “Israel” and what emerges is a powerful statement of what I see is the affliction that is now crippling the House of Representatives, and placing the balance of power of the Legislative Branch outlined in the Constitution in jeopardy.